Difference between revisions of "Seneca Review"
From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Tiered) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Poetry rejections== | ||
| + | ===Standard=== | ||
| + | '''2017''' | ||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | Dear [name], | ||
| + | |||
| + | We have read your poems with care, and I’m sorry to say that we have decided against including "_______" in Seneca Review. We thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Best wishes, | ||
| + | |||
| + | David Weiss | ||
| + | Geoffrey Babbitt | ||
| + | Editors, Seneca Review | ||
| + | |||
| + | PS: Just a reminder that we ask that you submit work only once during our annual reading period. | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
==Prose rejections== | ==Prose rejections== | ||
| − | ===Standard | + | ===Standard=== |
'''2013''' | '''2013''' | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| − | Dear | + | Dear [name], |
We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work. | We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work. | ||
Revision as of 12:21, 4 May 2017
Poetry rejections
Standard
2017
Dear [name],
We have read your poems with care, and I’m sorry to say that we have decided against including "_______" in Seneca Review. We thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.
Best wishes,
David Weiss Geoffrey Babbitt Editors, Seneca Review
PS: Just a reminder that we ask that you submit work only once during our annual reading period.
Prose rejections
Standard
2013
Dear [name],
We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work.
Sincerely,
The Editors
