Difference between revisions of "Fantasy and Science Fiction"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Adding some backup to the suggestion that this is a Higher Tier rejection.)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== Prose Rejections ==  
 
== Prose Rejections ==  
  
This higher tier rejection appears to be backed up by C.C. Finlay's blog post [http://www.ccfinlay.com/blog/nectar-for-rejectomancers.html here].
+
=== Form Rejection ===
Quote from page:
+
 
<blockquote>Template 3 is the “didn’t win me over” template. Look, you’re probably a pro. This is a good story. You know it’s good. You’re probably going to sell it elsewhere. Maybe I can tell you the idiosyncratic reasons why it didn’t make me all hot and tingly so that I can’t stop thinking about it day and night, night and day. Maybe I did. But either way, you probably don’t care. It’s a no. You’ve already got your next market lined up and you’re ready to send it out again.</blockquote>
+
<blockquote>Dear --,
 +
 
 +
Thank you for giving me a chance to read "---." Unfortunately, this story didn't quite work for me and I'm going to have to pass on it for Fantasy & Science Fiction. But I wish you best of luck finding the right market for it and hope that you'll keep us in mind in the future.
 +
 
 +
Best regards,
 +
 
 +
Charlie
 +
--
 +
C.C. Finlay, Editor
 +
Fantasy & Science Fiction
 +
fandsf.com | @fandsf</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
=== Higher Tiers ===
  
=== Higher Tier (possibly) ===
 
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
 
Dear ---,
 
Dear ---,
Line 21: Line 32:
 
Fantasy & Science Fiction
 
Fantasy & Science Fiction
 
fandsf.com | @fandsf
 
fandsf.com | @fandsf
 +
</blockquote>
  
</blockquote>
+
This higher tier rejection appears to be backed up by C.C. Finlay's blog post [http://www.ccfinlay.com/blog/nectar-for-rejectomancers.html here].
 +
Quote from page:
 +
<blockquote>Template 3 is the “didn’t win me over” template. Look, you’re probably a pro. This is a good story. You know it’s good. You’re probably going to sell it elsewhere. Maybe I can tell you the idiosyncratic reasons why it didn’t make me all hot and tingly so that I can’t stop thinking about it day and night, night and day. Maybe I did. But either way, you probably don’t care. It’s a no. You’ve already got your next market lined up and you’re ready to send it out again.</blockquote>

Latest revision as of 07:22, 13 November 2019

The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, founded in 1949, is the award-winning SF magazine which is the original publisher of SF classics like Stephen King's Dark Tower, Daniel Keyes's Flowers for Algernon, and Walter M. Miller's A Canticle for Leibowitz.

Prose Rejections

Form Rejection

Dear --,

Thank you for giving me a chance to read "---." Unfortunately, this story didn't quite work for me and I'm going to have to pass on it for Fantasy & Science Fiction. But I wish you best of luck finding the right market for it and hope that you'll keep us in mind in the future.

Best regards,

Charlie -- C.C. Finlay, Editor Fantasy & Science Fiction

fandsf.com | @fandsf

Higher Tiers

Dear ---,

Thank you for giving me a chance to read ---. I liked ---, but overall the story didn't quite win me over and I'm going to pass. I wish you best of luck finding the right market for it. I appreciate your interest in Fantasy & Science Fiction and hope that you'll keep us in mind in the future.

Best regards,

Charlie

-- C.C. Finlay, Editor Fantasy & Science Fiction fandsf.com | @fandsf

This higher tier rejection appears to be backed up by C.C. Finlay's blog post here. Quote from page:

Template 3 is the “didn’t win me over” template. Look, you’re probably a pro. This is a good story. You know it’s good. You’re probably going to sell it elsewhere. Maybe I can tell you the idiosyncratic reasons why it didn’t make me all hot and tingly so that I can’t stop thinking about it day and night, night and day. Maybe I did. But either way, you probably don’t care. It’s a no. You’ve already got your next market lined up and you’re ready to send it out again.