Difference between revisions of "Chicago Quarterly Review"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
Thank you for submitting "—" to the Chicago Quarterly Review. We appreciated the chance to read it and apologize for the delay getting back to you. We regret that we cannot use your submission and wish you the best of luck placing it elsewhere.  
 
Thank you for submitting "—" to the Chicago Quarterly Review. We appreciated the chance to read it and apologize for the delay getting back to you. We regret that we cannot use your submission and wish you the best of luck placing it elsewhere.  
 +
 +
Thank you for considering us.
 +
 +
Sincerely,
 +
 +
Chicago Quarterly Review
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
2021
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Dear —:
 +
 +
Thank you for submitting "---" to the Chicago Quarterly Review. We apologize for the delay getting back to you and regret that we are unable to accept your submission, but the number of submissions we receive makes it impossible to find room for many worthwhile manuscripts.
  
 
Thank you for considering us.  
 
Thank you for considering us.  

Latest revision as of 05:28, 13 November 2021

Prose rejections

Standard

Dear —:

Thank you for submitting "—" to the Chicago Quarterly Review. We appreciated the chance to read it and apologize for the delay getting back to you. We regret that we cannot use your submission and wish you the best of luck placing it elsewhere.

Thank you for considering us.

Sincerely,

Chicago Quarterly Review

2021

Dear —:

Thank you for submitting "---" to the Chicago Quarterly Review. We apologize for the delay getting back to you and regret that we are unable to accept your submission, but the number of submissions we receive makes it impossible to find room for many worthwhile manuscripts.

Thank you for considering us.

Sincerely,

Chicago Quarterly Review

Higher Tier

Dear ___:

Thank you for submitting "___" to the Chicago Quarterly Review. We've appreciated the chance to read your work and apologize for the delay getting back to you. Though we are unable to use this submission, the editors found much to admire and encourage you to submit more of your work in the future.

Thank you for considering us.

Sincerely,

Chicago Quarterly Review