Difference between revisions of "Seneca Review"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 15: Line 15:
 
PS: Just a reminder that we ask that you submit work only once during our annual reading period.  
 
PS: Just a reminder that we ask that you submit work only once during our annual reading period.  
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 +
  
 
'''2025'''
 
'''2025'''
 +
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
 
 
Dear ___ ___,
 
Dear ___ ___,
  
Line 28: Line 29:
  
 
Seneca Review
 
Seneca Review
 +
</blockquote>
  
 
==Prose rejections==
 
==Prose rejections==

Latest revision as of 07:46, 5 November 2025

Poetry rejections

Standard

2017

Dear [name],

We have read your poems with care, and I’m sorry to say that we have decided against including "_______" in Seneca Review. We thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.

Best wishes,

David Weiss Geoffrey Babbitt Editors, Seneca Review

PS: Just a reminder that we ask that you submit work only once during our annual reading period.


2025

Dear ___ ___,

Thanks so much for giving our team a chance to read your poems. Although we have decided against including " 4 poems: ___" in an upcoming issue, we are glad that you thought of Seneca Review as a possible home for your work.

Sincerely,

The Editors

Seneca Review

Prose rejections

Standard

2013

Dear [name],

We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work.

Sincerely,

The Editors

Higher tier

2019

Dear ________,

I am sorry to say we have decided against including "Title" in Seneca Review. Thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.

We welcome your future submissions during our next reading period.

Best wishes,

John D’Agata Essay Editor, Seneca Review