Difference between revisions of "Fence"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 42: Line 42:
 
The Editors of Fence
 
The Editors of Fence
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 +
 +
 +
 +
Dear eman,
 +
 +
Thank you for your patience as we read through the many Fiction manuscripts submitted to us. While we haven't made a final decision, we're happy to say that your work is still in the running. We expect to have a decision in the coming weeks.
 +
 +
Thank you again for submitting, and for your support of Fence.
 +
 +
All best,
 +
Jess Puglisi

Revision as of 18:29, 1 October 2015

Prose Rejections

Standard

Thank you for sending us “---.” We appreciated having the chance to read it, but feel that the piece is not for us.

Thanks again.

Sincerely,

Fence Editors

Thank you for sending us "---" We appreciated the chance to consider it, but it didn't work for Fence.

Sincerely,

The Editors of Fence

Higher Tier

Thank you for sending "---" for our consideration. While we are not going to publish it, we enjoyed it quite a bit and wish to encourage you to submit again. Please visit http://www.fenceportal.org and sign up for our email newsletter for notification of our next reading period.

Sincerely,

---

Fence

Thank you for sending us "---".

This particular piece was not a right fit for Fence, but we were very impressed by your writing. We hope that you will feel encouraged by this short note to send us something else.

We look forward to reading more.

Sincerely,

The Editors of Fence


Dear eman,

Thank you for your patience as we read through the many Fiction manuscripts submitted to us. While we haven't made a final decision, we're happy to say that your work is still in the running. We expect to have a decision in the coming weeks.

Thank you again for submitting, and for your support of Fence.

All best, Jess Puglisi