Difference between revisions of "Seneca Review"
(→Tiered) |
917laramigo (talk | contribs) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Poetry rejections== | ||
| + | ===Standard=== | ||
| + | '''2017''' | ||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | Dear [name], | ||
| + | |||
| + | We have read your poems with care, and I’m sorry to say that we have decided against including "_______" in Seneca Review. We thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Best wishes, | ||
| + | |||
| + | David Weiss | ||
| + | Geoffrey Babbitt | ||
| + | Editors, Seneca Review | ||
| + | |||
| + | PS: Just a reminder that we ask that you submit work only once during our annual reading period. | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''2025''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | Dear ___ ___, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks so much for giving our team a chance to read your poems. Although we have decided against including " 4 poems: ___" in an upcoming issue, we are glad that you thought of Seneca Review as a possible home for your work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sincerely, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Editors | ||
| + | |||
| + | Seneca Review | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
==Prose rejections== | ==Prose rejections== | ||
| − | ===Standard | + | ===Standard=== |
'''2013''' | '''2013''' | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| − | Dear | + | Dear [name], |
We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work. | We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 42: | ||
The Editors | The Editors | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Higher tier=== | ||
| + | '''2019''' | ||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | Dear ________, | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am sorry to say we have decided against including "Title" in Seneca Review. Thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We welcome your future submissions during our next reading period. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Best wishes, | ||
| + | |||
| + | John D’Agata | ||
| + | Essay Editor, Seneca Review | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Latest revision as of 07:46, 5 November 2025
Poetry rejections
Standard
2017
Dear [name],
We have read your poems with care, and I’m sorry to say that we have decided against including "_______" in Seneca Review. We thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.
Best wishes,
David Weiss Geoffrey Babbitt Editors, Seneca Review
PS: Just a reminder that we ask that you submit work only once during our annual reading period.
2025
Dear ___ ___,
Thanks so much for giving our team a chance to read your poems. Although we have decided against including " 4 poems: ___" in an upcoming issue, we are glad that you thought of Seneca Review as a possible home for your work.
Sincerely,
The Editors
Seneca Review
Prose rejections
Standard
2013
Dear [name],
We have read your submission to our [theme] issue with care, and we’re sorry to say that we’ve decided against including "_______" in this Seneca Review special issue. We thank you for thinking of us and for giving us a chance to read your work.
Sincerely,
The Editors
Higher tier
2019
Dear ________,
I am sorry to say we have decided against including "Title" in Seneca Review. Thank you for thinking of us and giving us a chance to read your work.
We welcome your future submissions during our next reading period.
Best wishes,
John D’Agata Essay Editor, Seneca Review
