User talk:D. A. Hosek - Revision history

D. A. Hosek: /* AWP */

2022-02-07T04:33:57Z

AWP

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 6 February 2022
Line 29:		Line 29:

	I know your talk page isn't the ideal place to ask this, but are you doing AWP? It'd be nice to meet you in person and thank you for all the work you've done creating this. --[[User:KentuckianinNY]]		I know your talk page isn't the ideal place to ask this, but are you doing AWP? It'd be nice to meet you in person and thank you for all the work you've done creating this. --[[User:KentuckianinNY]]

			: Before Covid, I had planned on doing AWP this year since it would finally not be scheduled opposite my wife's birthday, but with Covid, I've decided against it. Maybe 2024 [[User:D. A. Hosek\|D. A. Hosek]] ([[User talk:D. A. Hosek\|talk]]) 20:33, 6 February 2022 (PST)

2022-02-05T17:00:01Z

Undo revision 51743 by KentuckianinNY (talk) nope, didn't fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:00, 5 February 2022
Line 28:		Line 28:
	== AWP ==		== AWP ==

	I know your talk page isn't the ideal place to ask this, but are you doing AWP? It'd be nice to meet you in person and thank you for all the work you've done creating this. --[[KentuckianinNY]]		I know your talk page isn't the ideal place to ask this, but are you doing AWP? It'd be nice to meet you in person and thank you for all the work you've done creating this. --[[User:KentuckianinNY]]

2022-02-05T16:59:29Z

AWP: fix code direct?

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:59, 5 February 2022
Line 28:		Line 28:
	== AWP ==		== AWP ==

	I know your talk page isn't the ideal place to ask this, but are you doing AWP? It'd be nice to meet you in person and thank you for all the work you've done creating this. --[[~~User:~~KentuckianinNY]]		I know your talk page isn't the ideal place to ask this, but are you doing AWP? It'd be nice to meet you in person and thank you for all the work you've done creating this. --[[KentuckianinNY]]

2022-02-05T16:58:57Z

AWP: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:58, 5 February 2022
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Thanks again,		Thanks again,
	Kentuckian		Kentuckian

			== AWP ==

			I know your talk page isn't the ideal place to ask this, but are you doing AWP? It'd be nice to meet you in person and thank you for all the work you've done creating this. --[[User:KentuckianinNY]]

2021-12-21T16:49:52Z

Columbia Review/not spam: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:49, 21 December 2021
Line 18:		Line 18:
	NP. With some mags, it's easily done.		NP. With some mags, it's easily done.
	BTW, I've been a lurker on here for maybe a year, but just signed up as an editor today, so if you see any mistakes I might make, feel free to correct, assist, etc, thanks.		BTW, I've been a lurker on here for maybe a year, but just signed up as an editor today, so if you see any mistakes I might make, feel free to correct, assist, etc, thanks.

			== Columbia Review/not spam ==

			Hi, D.A. Thank you so much for your unfailing work on this site. I know how difficult spam management has been because I've seen so much of it listed on the recent changes page. FYI the filter stopped me from creating a new entry for [Columbia Review] today (note this is different from the [Columbia Journal] entry we were discussing earlier). It thought I was spam twice and gave me a catchpa question each time, which I hope I answered correctly (to be or not ___, etc - maybe it's case sensitive). Finally it told me the review's web domain, which was included in their rejection, was triggering the problem (l i n k t r . e e /thecolumbiareview - spaced so I won't face spam problems here). My guess is this domain is probably one where a lot of spam comes from and it's blacklisted, but just an FYI. I was able to remove the web address from the reject and push the entry through.

			Thanks again,
			Kentuckian

2021-11-04T19:15:14Z

Notices of spam

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 4 November 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Found some on [[Automatic pad submission]]		Found some on [[Automatic pad submission]]
	--[[User:DA\|DA]] ([[User talk:DA\|talk]]) 02:12, 20 September 2014 (PDT)		--[[User:DA\|DA]] ([[User talk:DA\|talk]]) 02:12, 20 September 2014 (PDT)


			>>Thanks for the heads up on this.

	== Thanks for the thanks ==		== Thanks for the thanks ==

2021-10-25T13:30:27Z

Thanks for the thanks: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:30, 25 October 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Found some on [[Automatic pad submission]]		Found some on [[Automatic pad submission]]
	--[[User:DA\|DA]] ([[User talk:DA\|talk]]) 02:12, 20 September 2014 (PDT)		--[[User:DA\|DA]] ([[User talk:DA\|talk]]) 02:12, 20 September 2014 (PDT)

			== Thanks for the thanks ==

			NP. With some mags, it's easily done.
			BTW, I've been a lurker on here for maybe a year, but just signed up as an editor today, so if you see any mistakes I might make, feel free to correct, assist, etc, thanks.

2014-09-20T09:12:25Z

Notices of spam

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 20 September 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Is this how I should let you know?		Is this how I should let you know?
	:Yep, thanks. [[User:D. A. Hosek\|D. A. Hosek]] 20:14, 14 August 2011 (PDT)		:Yep, thanks. [[User:D. A. Hosek\|D. A. Hosek]] 20:14, 14 August 2011 (PDT)

			Found some on [[Automatic pad submission]]
			--[[User:DA\|DA]] ([[User talk:DA\|talk]]) 02:12, 20 September 2014 (PDT)

2011-09-13T20:50:16Z

test

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 13 September 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Is this how I should let you know?		Is this how I should let you know?
	:Yep, thanks. [[User:D. A. Hosek\|D. A. Hosek]] 20:14, 14 August 2011 (PDT)		:Yep, thanks. [[User:D. A. Hosek\|D. A. Hosek]] 20:14, 14 August 2011 (PDT)

	~~=== test ===~~

2011-09-13T20:48:57Z

test