Threepenny Review - Revision history

KentuckianinNY: /* Standard */ bold tag

2022-01-28T14:06:42Z

Standard: bold tag

Rxb1296: /* Standard */

2018-02-08T16:19:05Z

Standard

Yetagain: /* Prose Rejections */

2018-01-05T05:41:35Z

Prose Rejections

71.62.158.163: /* Prose Rejections */

2011-08-07T19:30:06Z

Prose Rejections

Potshot at 18:23, 23 June 2011

2011-06-23T18:23:10Z

Potshot: Created page with ""The Threepenny Review is an American literary magazine founded in 1980. It is published in Berkeley, California by founding editor Wendy Lesser. Maintaining a quarterly schedule..."

2011-06-23T18:22:53Z

Created page with ""The Threepenny Review is an American literary magazine founded in 1980. It is published in Berkeley, California by founding editor Wendy Lesser. Maintaining a quarterly schedule..."

New page

"The Threepenny Review is an American literary magazine founded in 1980. It is published in Berkeley, California by founding editor Wendy Lesser. Maintaining a quarterly schedule (March, June, September, December), it offers fiction, memoirs, poetry, essays and criticism to a readership of 10,000. Without the support of patrons or a university, the publication has an annual budget of $200,000."

== Prose Rejections ==

<p>
'''Standard'''
<p>
We have considered your submission carefully, and unfortunately we are not able to use it in The Threepenny Review. Please do not take this as a comment on the quality of your writing; we receive so many submissions that we are able to accept only a small fraction of them.
<p>
Thank you for sending your work to us, and please accept our apologies for the automated message system. We wish we had time to reply to everyone individually.
<p>
Editors

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 </blockquote>
+'''2018'''
 <blockquote>
 We have read your submission, and unfortunately we are not able to use it in The Threepenny Review.  Please do not take this as a comment on the quality of your writing; we receive so many submissions that we are able to accept only a small fraction of them.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 8 February 2018
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Editors		Editors
		+	</blockquote>
		+
		+	2018
		+	<blockquote>
		+	We have read your submission, and unfortunately we are not able to use it in The Threepenny Review. Please do not take this as a comment on the quality of your writing; we receive so many submissions that we are able to accept only a small fraction of them.
		+
		+	Thank you for sending your work to us, and please accept our apologies for the automated message system. We wish we had time to reply to everyone individually.
	</blockquote>		</blockquote>

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 </blockquote>
-=== Higher Tier ===
+== Poetry Rejections ==
 <blockquote>
-Text of Higher Tier Rejection
+We have read your submission, and unfortunately we are not able to use it in The Threepenny Review.  Please do not take this as a comment on the quality of your writing; we receive so many submissions that we are able to accept only a small fraction of them.
 </blockquote>

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 == Prose Rejections ==
-'''Standard'''
+=== Standard ===
+<blockquote>
 We have considered your submission carefully, and unfortunately we are not able to use it in The Threepenny Review.  Please do not take this as a comment on the quality of your writing; we receive so many submissions that we are able to accept only a small fraction of them.
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Editors