Hobart

2015-11-23T18:07:08Z

Lukedani: /* Sub-Standard? */

== Prose Rejections==

===Sub-Standard?===

<blockquote>

Thank you for sending us “[title]”. We appreciate the chance to read it. Unfortunately, the piece is not for us.

Thanks again. Best of luck with this.

Sincerely,

Hobart

</blockquote>

===Standard===

<blockquote>
Thank you very much for submitting but I don't think we're the right match for this. Please know we read and appreciate every submission and it pains us a little to be resorting to such a standard reply, but submissions keep coming in and the hours keep slipping away and what is one to do. Best of luck!

Thank you again,

HOBART

</blockquote>

===Higher Tier===

<blockquote>
Thank you very much for submitting but I don't think we're the right match for this one, though there is some strong writing here and I hope we will get to read more.

Please know we read and appreciate every submission and it pains us a little to be resorting to such a standard reply, but submissions keep coming in and the hours keep slipping away and what is one to do. Best of luck!

Thank you again,

HOBART

</blockquote>

== Poetry Rejections==

===Sub-Standard?===

<blockquote>

Thank you for sending us "[title]" Unfortunately these poems don't fit our needs at this time. We appreciate your interest in Hobart and wish you good luck in placing your work elsewhere.

Sincerely,
Aaron Burch
Hobart

</blockquote>

===Higher Tier===

<blockquote>

thank you for submitting to hobart. i enjoyed your work, but unfortunately it doesn’t fit our needs at this time. i wish you luck placing your poems elsewhere, and would like to encourage you to submit again once more work becomes available.

looking forward to reading more
thanks again

sincerely,
madison langston
hobart

</blockquote>

The Missouri Review

2015-11-18T01:37:01Z

Lukedani: /* Personal */

== Prose rejections ==

=== Standard ===
<blockquote>
Thank you for giving us the chance to consider “---” for publication in The Missouri Review. Though it does not fit our current needs, we appreciate your interest in our magazine and your commitment to quality writing.

We wish you the best of luck publishing your work and hope you’ll consider sending us more in the future.

Sincerely,

The Editors
</blockquote>

=== Higher-Tier ===

<blockquote>
Dear Name:

Sincere thanks for sending us "Title" for consideration. Your work impressed the editorial staff (insert compliment about story here). Though not selected for publication, the piece makes us hope we'll see more of your writing in the near future.

Sincerely,

The Editors
</blockquote>

=== Highest Tier ===
<blockquote>Unfortunately, your submission was not chosen for inclusion in our journal. However, your piece came very close, and many of our readers greatly enjoyed it. We strongly encourage that you submit with us again, because we definitely enjoyed the strong piece you submitted.</blockquote>

=== Personal ===
Message from EIC of TMR praising specific aspects of the story, offering criticism/suggestions re: other aspects, concluding:
<blockquote>though I’m passing on this one, I do hope to see more from you.</blockquote>
Also (handwritten):
<blockquote>Please try us again! -- The Editors</blockquote>
Also (handwritten):
<blockquote>Not what we need right now but keep writing and sending in your other stories!</blockquote>
Also (handwritten) from "The Editors", attached to the standard form rejection:
<blockquote>Thanks, [author name]. We enjoyed it! --The Editors </blockquote>

== Poetry rejections ==

=== Standard ===

=== Higher-Tier ===
<blockquote>Thanks for sending The Missouri Review these poems. Though we did not see a feature this round, we liked your sure craft. As always, we appreciate your continued support and commitment. We hope you keep us in mind in the future.

Sincerely,

The Editors</blockquote>

Rejection Wiki - User contributions [en]

Hobart

The Missouri Review