Difference between revisions of "Talk:Story Quarterly"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Would be very curious when the rejection I've logged as "Sub-standard?" is SQ's new form rejection. I've received the "Standard" one that someone else logged earlier myself, in N...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Would be very curious when the rejection I've logged as "Sub-standard?" is SQ's new form rejection. I've received the "Standard" one that someone else logged earlier myself, in Nov 2010. The "Sub-standard?" one came in Aug 2011. I especially love their use and placement of "really"--it's not just not right for them, it's REALLY not right!
+
Would be very curious when the rejection I've logged as "Sub-standard?" is SQ's new form rejection, or a special "screw off, plz" just for me. I've received the "Standard" one that someone else logged earlier myself, in Nov 2010. The "Sub-standard?" one came in Aug 2011. I especially love their use and placement of "really"--it's not just not right for them, it's REALLY not right!

Latest revision as of 15:10, 20 August 2011

Would be very curious when the rejection I've logged as "Sub-standard?" is SQ's new form rejection, or a special "screw off, plz" just for me. I've received the "Standard" one that someone else logged earlier myself, in Nov 2010. The "Sub-standard?" one came in Aug 2011. I especially love their use and placement of "really"--it's not just not right for them, it's REALLY not right!