Difference between revisions of "Hobart"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Sub-Standard?: changing "substandard" to "standard" b/c I've also gotten this version a bunch of times + updating with note on the year)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Prose Rejections==
 
== Prose Rejections==
  
===Sub-Standard?===
+
===Basic Standard (2018)===
  
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 
 
  
 
===Standard===
 
===Standard===

Revision as of 09:05, 16 September 2018

Prose Rejections

Basic Standard (2018)

Thank you for sending us “[title]”. We appreciate the chance to read it. Unfortunately, the piece is not for us.

Thanks again. Best of luck with this.

Sincerely,

Hobart

Standard

Thank you very much for submitting but I don't think we're the right match for this. Please know we read and appreciate every submission and it pains us a little to be resorting to such a standard reply, but submissions keep coming in and the hours keep slipping away and what is one to do. Best of luck!

Thank you again,

HOBART


Higher Tier

Thank you very much for submitting but I don't think we're the right match for this one, though there is some strong writing here and I hope we will get to read more.

Please know we read and appreciate every submission and it pains us a little to be resorting to such a standard reply, but submissions keep coming in and the hours keep slipping away and what is one to do. Best of luck!

Thank you again,

HOBART

Poetry Rejections

Sub-Standard?


Thank you for sending us "[title]" Unfortunately these poems don't fit our needs at this time. We appreciate your interest in Hobart and wish you good luck in placing your work elsewhere.


Sincerely, Aaron Burch Hobart

Higher Tier


thank you for submitting to hobart. i enjoyed your work, but unfortunately it doesn’t fit our needs at this time. i wish you luck placing your poems elsewhere, and would like to encourage you to submit again once more work becomes available.

looking forward to reading more thanks again

sincerely, madison langston hobart