Difference between revisions of "Gettysburg Review"

From Rejection Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 39: Line 39:
 
The Gettysburg Review  
 
The Gettysburg Review  
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 +
'''2019'''
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Dear First Last,
  
 +
Thank you for submitting some of your latest poems. We regret that none suit our present needs. Please accept our apologies for the delayed and disappointing decision and our thanks for your patience.
 +
 +
Best of luck with them and your other work.
 +
 +
Sincerely,
 +
 +
The Gettysburg Review
 +
</blockquote>
 
=== Higher Tier ===
 
=== Higher Tier ===
  

Revision as of 16:53, 15 February 2019

Prose rejections

Standard

Thank you for letting us consider your manuscript. We regret that it does not suit our present needs.

Higher Tier

Dear ------,

Thank you for letting us consider "------." While your manuscript does not suit present needs, we enjoyed your writing and hope you will submit again.

Sincerely,

Jess Bryant The Gettysburg Review

Personal

"Story" contains much good, strong writing, but there's not enough of a narrative arc for it to work as a short story. Best of luck with the novel. Sincerely, XXX.

Poetry rejections

Standard

Dear ------,

Thank you for letting us consider "------." We regret that it does not suit present needs.

Best of luck with it and your other work.

Sincerely,

The Gettysburg Review

2019

Dear First Last,

Thank you for submitting some of your latest poems. We regret that none suit our present needs. Please accept our apologies for the delayed and disappointing decision and our thanks for your patience.

Best of luck with them and your other work.

Sincerely,

The Gettysburg Review

Higher Tier

Text of Higher Tier Rejection